Judith's Java
  • Page 1 of 37
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • ...
  • »
  • »»

ON LEGENDS LOVED AND LOST

Aug 13, 2014 -- 9:38pm

Everyone loved Chicago born and bred Robin Williams. We loved him for his smile and wacky sense of humor.  We live in a troubled world, but Williams made us forget it for a little while.  He gained fame as Mork, the loveable alien and recently as the advertising executive on TV’s The Crazy Ones. Often room would be left in scripts for Williams’ brilliant ad libs.

Alas, life wasn’t so funny for this funny man, and apparently that’s why on August 11th Robin Williams hanged himself. Fans have been asking ‘why?’ Williams is reported to have suffered from depression and substance abuse—syndromes that often occur in creative people, but don’t necessarily result in suicide.

What drove Williams to the ultimate extreme? Did his depression and addiction stem from an unhappy childhood?  Raised in Chicago, Lake Forest and Lake Bluff, Williams remembered his childhood fondly. He called Chicago a first-class city, and remembered life in Lake Bluff as family friendly. No demons here.

Another Chicago actor and comedian, Bill Murray, shed light on what may have made Williams suicidal. Their careers are eerily parallel. Murray lived and worked around Chicago and made his mark as a comic. Murray also adlibs.  Rumors of Murray’s death circulated on the Internet. Fortunately, these were a hoax.

But Murray, perceptively, noted the dangers of fame. “There's definitely a lot of trash that comes with the prize of being famous,” he said. “It's a nice gift, but there's a lot of wrapping and paper and junk to cut through.” It’s also lonely at the top, Murray pointed out.  “That is a great taboo, isn't it? No one really wants to admit they are lonely…But I have felt lonely many times in my life.”[1]

Robin Williams couldn’t handle the “trash” that came with fame, or the loneliness of genius. Rest in Peace, Robin.



[1] Bill Murray, as quoted in IMDB, http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000195/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm

from the desk of judithrae ross august View Comments (0)

SLEEP WALKING OR NOT; LAY OFF THE 1980s… OR ELSE!

Aug 07, 2014 -- 10:39pm

Reagan scholar, Craig Shirley has sued author, Rick Perlstein, The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan[1] for plagiarism, asserting Perlstein repeatedly quoted Shirley without “proper” attribution. Shirley’s attorney, Chris Ashby cited 19 instances of so-called failure to cite, and demanded $25 million in damages, a public apology, revisions in the digital copies, and the burning of all extant paper copies[2].

On August 6th, on Chicago Tonight Perlstein retorted, noting that he cited Shirley 152 times. Perlstein further pointed out that he praised Shirley’s work on Reagan.

Why the furor?  President Reagan may be St. Ronnie because we want remember the Reagan era as a golden age. If President Reagan is less than saintly, the golden age becomes “fools’ gold”. That may explain why Reagan was the “Teflon” President. Nothing, not even trading hostages for arms tarnished his image.

Where’s the plagiarism? Perlstein neither “stole” Shirley’s thesis nor failed to cite him. As for Ashby’s demand that all copies of Perlstein’s book be burnt, Counselor, this is America—not the 3rd Reich. Perlstein shows what really occurred, debunking the golden age myth in the process…and this lawsuit proves yet another adage--the truth hurts.

This episode brought back memories. A renowned historian had come to the Newberry Library when I was finishing my dissertation. I introduced myself; he asked about my dissertation. I told him and he was all ears. A few weeks later a friend showed me a new essay by this man which parroted what I had said-- but without my name. He commented, “Your pocket has been picked.” I was robbed. Luckily, I hadn’t told this plagiarist enough to scuttle my dissertation. But that day I learned how badly real plagiarism hurts.

 



[1] Rick Perlstein, The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan, (New York: Simon & Schuster), 2014.

[2] Karoli (sic), Conservatives to Rick Perlstein: Leave St. Ronnie Alone! Crooksandliars.com/2014/08conservatives-rick-perlstein-leave-st, August 5, 2014.

from the desk of judithrae ross august View Comments (0)

BIG BROTHER’S ALIVE AND WELL AND CALLING THE SHOTS AT WATERSAVER

Jul 31, 2014 -- 9:04am

This world’s a mess, and that made it difficult to find a blog topic. What can compare to the wars in the Middle East and the Civil War in Ukraine? Winnetka isn’t bombing Robbins; no civil war in LaGrange, nor has Minneapolis annexed Milwaukee and amassed troops at Chicago’s borders.

Fortunately for my Java and I something came up that’s truly blog-worthy. The workers at WaterSaver, Chicago are negotiating their contract, and one of their demands is not being hassled when they go to the bathroom. The management at WaterSaver have become the Potty Patrol—PP for short.

According to President and Owner Steven Kersten, WaterSaver’s employees waste precious company time in the john texting and playing games on their Smart Phones. So Kerston allows his employees six minutes per day for washroom breaks. Employees must swipe their I.D. cards when entering and leaving the washroom. Take more than 6 minutes a day and employees receive a warning; repeated warnings can lead to dismissal. Think of it. An employee can be fired for having too many stomach aches.

 If these PP regs become widespread going to the john will qualify as an Olympic event. Won’t we be proud when USA becomes number 1 in the “Number 2” speed event!

There’s a bright side. Employees who keep their washroom breaks to under six minutes a day receive a reward. Wanna know what it is? Okay, wait for it, wait for it…they receive A DOLLAR. There hasn’t been such excitement since Kellogg’s awarded $1.00 to anyone who could prove they brought Corn Flakes a century ago. Whoopee!

Teamster Local #743 backs WaterSaver’s employees all the way. It’s basic: People have the right to use the washroom whenever the need occurs. They should never worry about how long it takes.

WaterSaver, make sure your break area is Smart Phone compatible, and go to the john. You’re the ones who are full of it.

from the desk of judithrae ross july View Comments (0)

“COMPLICATED” DOESN’T BEGIN TO DESCRIBE IT

Jul 23, 2014 -- 9:40pm

ITEM: Last weekend, an 11 year old girl was killed by a ricocheting bullet; 40 others were wounded by gunfire. ITEM: Recently, 20 people were shot in a 24 hour period. ITEM: Chicago Police Chief Garry McCarthy convened a forum of community leaders to seek ways of curbing gun violence. ITEM: Police announce that crime is declining.

Statistics show crime’s declining, but gun violence sure isn’t. No doubt those community leaders will announce that the surge of illegal weapons, and changes in the gun laws lay at gun violence’s root.

But that only scratches the surface. Gun violence will decline when gang activity declines. Guns and gangs go hand in hand, and that’s why getting guns off the street is so difficult. Do the math: Gangs are growingà more gangs; more gunsà more shootings; more shootingsà more dead people.

Gangs aren’t new. Some have been around since the 1950s…and children follow in their great-grandparents’ footsteps. Gangs have traditions, colors, signs and clothing styles. When neighborhoods unite against gangs, said gangs move to another neighborhood. Sending gang-members to prison only turns them into hardened criminals. Some Chicago police call prison “Criminal U.”

Gang membership will decrease when kids and teens get the chance to easily find good jobs. But, the Chicago School Board cuts many programs that lead to good jobs. An education is supposed to teach children to think, question and create. How does this happen when art, music, vocational programs and 66% of school librarians are on the chopping block?

The Chicago system sorts children by ability. Those whom teachers assume are the brightest go to the elite high schools, like Lane Tech or Whitney Young; the presumed “lesser lights” go to the blackboard jungle and drop out. Where’s their future?

This is a “jobless” recovery. Mom and Dad are working 3 low-paying jobs, and barely making it. They’re all hungry—and fat-- from a steady diet of grease and sugar.

Let’s get to the roots before the weeds—AKA guns—take over.

from the desk of judithrae ross july View Comments (0)

THEY’RE CHILDREN!

Jul 17, 2014 -- 11:26pm

For once, the national crisis of the month isn’t funding the government or passing a budget. Sixty thousand children, largely under ten years old have crossed into America from Nicargua, Honduras and El Salvador. They’ve come alone, without documents, in search of a life free from drug lords and dictators.

These children survived long hikes, bad weather and a train ride nicknamed “the Beast.” In short, they’ve been through Hell. Their parents, often spent themselves into poverty hiring a “coyote” to guide them across the border. Many of these kids face murder if they are forced to return to their Central American countries.

Our peerless leaders’ reaction to the surge of children suggests that either someone’s been poisoning their coffee or the extra-terrestrials have invaded and replaced said officials with goons.

Texas’ Congressman Louie Gohmert (R) likened this immigration surge to the Nazi invasion of France, proposing that Texas has a constitutional right to wage war on them. Pointing out the similarities between these “invaders” and cancer, he called on President Obama to send National Guard troops to “repel” this invasion. This @#&*%#* junk made it into many Chicagoland newscasts. Wow! Goebbels couldn’t have done any better!

Reality check: These are children, in search of a better life. Who actually won the Mexican War? We got Texas, and Mexico never had to contend with Congressman Gohmert.

Closer to home, IL Republican Senator Mark Kirk asserted we need to have background checks performed on each of the undocumented children housed here. The Senator discovered funds in the 2014 budget to house 429 undocumented minors who crossed into North America from Central America without parents. Apparently, this led Senator Kirk to fear that some of the newly-arrived children were headed to his neighborhood. Perish the thought!

…And who would provide these background checks? Drug dealers, smugglers, cartels? Their relatives in public office? Whatever happened to “Give me your tired, your poor?”

Is not America a nation of immigrants? Enough already! Grant these children asylum now.

from the desk of judithrae ross julyView Comments (0)

REQUEIM FOR A VERY WELL-LIKED SENATOR

Jul 10, 2014 -- 9:06pm

Senator Alan J. Dixon, 86 died July 6th at his Fairview Heights, IL. home. He served in the U.S. Senate from 1981-1993. Prior to that he had been Illinois’ Secretary of State. Dixon was beloved by the politicians and voters-alike-and never lost an election until 1992. His election to the Senate seemed pre-ordained.

I first met Dixon in 1980. Here’s how it happened. In 1976, I worked on President Carter’s election campaign as a paid consultant. No Washington job materialized for me, but campaign friendships stayed long after President Carter took his hand off the Bible. One campaign friend called, asking me if I would serve on Secretary Dixon’s women’s committee. I happily accepted.

The Women’s Committee raised money for Mr. Dixon, and advised him on how certain issues resonated with women. Once, a few of us informed Dixon that certain comments would cost him many women’s votes; I suddenly found myself explaining why he needed to soften his stance. Afterward, I muttered to my friends, “Great we just went head-to-head with the Secretary of State.” I waited for notice that my driver’s license was revoked. Instead, I heard one of the conservative radio talking heads lament that candidate Dixon was backing away from his more conservative anti-feminist statements. Dixon listened and took heed.

Rather than becoming a statesman, Senator Dixon became the Senator who worked on Illinois constituent issues. He also voted with the Republicans on procedural matters. That turned out to be his undoing.

Dixon voted to confirm Clarence Thomas’ nomination to the Supreme Court despite Anita Hill’s accusations of sexual harassment. In one fell swoop, Senator Dixon lost the women’s vote, as Carol Moseley Braun defeated him in the 1992 primary. The Senator morphed into a political consultant, while Thomas went on to an utterly undistinguished career as a Justice.

Senator Alan Dixon was no Senator Daniel Webster. But he kept his word: “When it needs be done”… Dixon did it. I’ll miss him.

from the desk of judithrae ross july View Comments (0)
  • Page 1 of 37
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • ...
  • »
  • »»